From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 01:51:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20130702235111.GA26489@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <87k3l8q4vx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuALu-0001jd-Lc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:51:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuALt-0008TD-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:51:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:39416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuALt-0008T4-4d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:51:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so5677230wid.5 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com (sd44012d5.adsl.online.nl. [212.64.18.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ev19sm25747114wid.2.2013.07.02.16.51.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:09:35AM +0800, feng shu wrote: > Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. > Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk > or add #OPTIONS: ;latex_pdf_process latexmk If you don't mind my chiming in, the standard way to customise Emacs behaviour (across all modes, not just Org) is through customize-variable. Org cannot keep on introducing new keywords just because of convenience. In any case, this is also a security risk. This starts an external process. Allowing something like this means one can run an arbitrary command just by exporting a file. I do not think that is wise at all. Exactly for this reason we have org-confirm-babel-evaluate defaulting to t. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.