From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [RFC]: Uniform indentation for lists Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20130625094456.GA3680@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <87hagntblh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrPo9-0005Mf-2J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:45:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrPo7-0000Wm-Vo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:45:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]:53210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrPo7-0000V7-QE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:45:03 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d17so6631549eek.0 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com ([88.128.80.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm34619692eed.9.2013.06.25.02.44.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87hagntblh.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Jambunathan, On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:28:34AM +0530, Jambunathan K wrote: > > I was wondering whether there would be some interest in > > 1) To eliminate the separators - "." or ")" - in the numbered list > 2) Enhance the list repair routine so that it will alway indent by 3 spaces. > > With (1) above, the earlier list becomes, > > 1 One > 2 Two > - Bullet One > - Bullet Two > 1 One > 2 Two I think it will still break for long lists (greater than 9 items). 9 item 10 item That said, if this is followed up, I would prefer (2). The "." and ")" tend to serve as useful indicators for me. I also find them helpful when I use the @ syntax. 3. [@3] Item 4. Another item Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.