From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [Feature Request] - Furigana - Yomigana - Ruby Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 20:13:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20130529181323.GE16384@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <51A3E117.3000900@gmail.com> <51A4D087.5010901@googlemail.com> <51A61CB5.2070405@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhksM-0007lx-8P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:13:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhksK-000256-RS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:13:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:39069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhksK-000251-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:13:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hn14so3816119wib.8 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com ([2001:610:120:3000:f2de:f1ff:fe37:c76c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fz8sm32896130wib.2.2013.05.29.11.13.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 May 2013 11:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51A61CB5.2070405@googlemail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Tristan, Since you broought up Org versions, I thought it would be pertinent to classify the version dependence of the possible solutions. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Tristan Nakagawa wrote: > > I didn't get Suvayus solution in the old version, i suspect it might > work in the new version, but since the snippet version (see below) > doesnt involve changing the backend for every macro, i didn't follow up > on it My solution with filters is only possible with Org 8.x or above. Also a minor nit-pick, my solution goes into your emacs setup; the backends stay as it is. But I would say Christian's solution is much more elegant and portable in the sense that the Org file is self contained and independent of the setup. > Thomas' ruby link solution works nicely (except the closing tag should > be , not <\ruby>, and works for both for latex and html. > > The only downside is that you won't see the symbol in the original > orgfile or in section headers in the export, just the reading, but that > is a very minor annoyance and this is a very nice elegant solution with > a very readable source org file. > (I don't guess the link could be redefined to switch reading and symbol > around?) Tom's solution is probably the most portable across different Org versions. > Christians suggestion with snippets works great, both for html and pdf > via latex; even in section headers. > (it took me reading the 8.0 upgrade info to understand we were talking > about the symbol, not literally "" in the code. This one again is a Org 8.x or above solution. Hope you can adapt either of these to your needs. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.