Hi Rasmus and Alan,

I've changed the code so the value for foldmarks is passed through to
KOMA-Script. It's a bit ugly insofar as one has to specify
foldmarks:true to use the default values instead of other options, such
as backaddress:t. However, subject also uses a string already.

See the attached patch.

Cheers,
Viktor

Rasmus wrote:

> Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> Yeah, I guess it's true.  Still, since foldmarks depends on which
> >> envelopes you have at hand it might make sense to have it accept a
> >> string.  In lisp-terms a string is still t.  On the other hand the
> >> current approach is consistent with your approach above so that's a
> >> merit.
> >
> > The more I think about it the more I agree that you should be able to
> > set any value of foldmarks. The only problem I see is that for other
> > boolean options one can use `t' whereas for foldmarks one would need to
> > use `true' (because `t' is a valid configuration value for foldmarks).
> > But as long as that's documented I see no problem. I will post a patch,
> > once Alan applies my previous patches.
> 
> I don't know the details of the exporter well enough on this detail,
> but perhaps it can be utilized that t ≠ "t"; if that's true in the
> exporter as well.  In normal lisp (characterp "t") => t and
> (characterp t) nil.  But I'm not sure if t would be transformed before
> being able to check. . . 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rasmus
> 
> -- 
> May the Force be with you
>