From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Frankel Subject: Re: Some %elements in org-html-postamble-format became too "generous" Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:55:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20130409015548.GB23190@BigDog.local> References: <8761zyzhf5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <87ppy6xzjf.fsf@gmail.com> <87txnixq63.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <87li8uxkcd.fsf@gmail.com> <20130407185101.GA22894@BigDog.local> <87sj32w4hg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPNmq-0004d4-Tp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:55:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPNmo-00072y-EG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:55:52 -0400 Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=59852 helo=mail.rickster.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPNmo-00072u-5D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:55:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sj32w4hg.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Dieter Wilhelm , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:00:27PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Rick Frankel writes: > > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 08:32:34PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Dieter Wilhelm writes: > >> > Or just using a default time string format which is language > >> > independent, like %Y-%m-%d. > >> > >> There's `org-html--timestamp-format', which is used for all timestamps > >> in preamble, postamble and metadata. It's clearly an internal variable. > >> I don't know if it is used because the format is required or because it > >> saves copying over the same format string. > >> > >> Since I don't know the intent behind this, I can't tell if it could be > >> made a defcustom. > > > > It was created just localize the definition. I see no reason not to > > make it a defcustom. > > Then what about this patch? Works for me. rick