From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: C-c ^ not fully useful Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:59:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20130221095951.GB4899@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Swh-0004pX-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:00:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8SwW-0002CZ-P4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:00:04 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:36007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8SwW-0002Bv-B2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:59:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so7443373wgb.24 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:59:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:36:57PM -0500, François Pinard wrote: > > - Could org-sort, by default and for most of its current option letters, > sort alphabetically (or lexicographically as they say!) over the > visual aspect of the line instead of its physical contents? It might > be difficult if Emacs has no function to reach the visual aspect of a > line. I guess that most users would expect a visual sort. I think this is a good idea. It should be possible to just test if the first entity is a "link" and extract the title part using org-elements > - Options might be added to sort over the physical contents of the line > instead. And there always is M-x sort-lines RET !). Agreed. > - Could some parameterisation be added so one could map user written > functions over (free) option letters? Again, a good idea. :) Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.