From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: Extending org-contacts with properties: naming properties Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:59:07 +0200 Message-ID: <2013-08-07T09-52-51@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2013-08-05T11-48-35@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87wqnz7haf.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6yeU-00080U-TK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:59:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6yeP-0008Fa-1G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:59:26 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6yeO-0008FV-Qn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:59:20 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V6yeM-00058h-Ju for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:59:18 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:59:18 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:59:18 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * David Rogers wrote: > > I agree that this kind of simple thing looks like a better > idea. However, it would also be nice to be able to call it some name > where a person who encounters the software capability but doesn't yet > know what it's for will understand what it's for just from reading the > name. This is my goal, yes. > "Given" is simple and sounds clear, but it doesn't say who did the > giving so the clarity is over-rated. "CustomerInfoIGaveThem" is a bit > long. :) (and TheirRecordOfMe is hardly any better.) :) I am trying to find something that fulfills the trade-off between short and descriptive/long. Is it true that none of my words from the first mail is reaching the goal somewhat? - mediated - informed - assigned - passed - requested - connexidatum - stored - delivered I am depending here on the native speakers who can judge better than me using a translation tool ... Then, there are some possible combinations I could think of: - I_gave_phone - About_me_phone - About_my_phone - ... -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github