From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: [Bug] Re: bug with org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift? Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:43:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2013-04-23T10-35-52@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2FB59C57-19D0-42A0-A243-1E933E80B757@ingmarmeissner.de> <86bo9ap88e.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUYpm-00025C-B5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:44:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUYph-0005MB-5s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:44:18 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUYpg-0005Lz-Vs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:44:13 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UUYpf-0000ck-2i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:44:11 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:44:11 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:44:11 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * David Rogers wrote: > Ingmar Meissner writes: Hi! >> it seems to me that "org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift" is not working >> correct with org-mode 8.0. Usually i could specify a time shift, but >> not anymore. Did i miss something? > > I had the same problem; it's not a bug, it still works, just the default > behaviour has been changed for 8.0. > > The change is that the time-shift is no longer automatic. Now, before > you type > > C-c C-x c > > you need to type > > C-u > > first, so that the whole command is "C-u C-c C-x c", if you want the > time shift. Otherwise, you get a plain clone with no time > shift. Thanks for clearing this issue, David. I totally agree with Ingmar that this is definitely a bug: The function is called "org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift" and in its default behavior (without the universal argument), it does *not* shift time. When a user does "M-x org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift" and there is no time shift, she/he gets irritated - just like Ingmar, just like I was. To me, the desired behavior should be like this: org-clone-subtree ... the same behavior as David described above for the current situation of org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift with an optional universal argument to ask for time shift if you want. org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift ... the old behavior where the user gets asked about the time shift What function of those two is mapped to "C-c C-x c" is an independent defined issue. I would love to see this bug fixed. -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github