From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Export options processed in example block Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:55:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20121018145521.GC16407@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <507FCCED.8000605@mdl29.net> <20121018103204.GA16407@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <507FFD19.5000702@mdl29.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOrVZ-0003iX-GJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:55:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOrVS-0001kD-AJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:55:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:35844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOrVS-0001jg-4R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:55:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gg4so5529678wgb.30 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507FFD19.5000702@mdl29.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Nicolas Quiniou wrote: > Le 18/10/2012 12:32, Suvayu Ali a écrit : > > So something like this should work: > > > > #+TITLE: Testing example block > > > > #+begin_example > > ,#+TITLE: My title > > #+end_example > > That's right. Thanks you. > > Could we improve org-protecting-blocks documentation or Org manual on > that point ? > It is documented in the manual; see here: [[info:org#Literal%20examples][info:org#Literal examples]] If you edit the example block with C-c ', then Org mode takes care of the comment characters. However I'm not sure how to tell that what you are entering is org source when all you have is a line with keywords or comments. If you feel the documentation could be clearer, please feel free to send a patch. One immediate improvement I could think of was to include that little discussion and footnote in the manual index under comments. Hope this helps. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.