From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mandar Mitra <mandar.mitra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: how to schedule over a range of dates?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:18:37 +0530
Message-ID: <20120422184837.GA16818@gmail.com>
References: <20120422145808.GA13490@gmail.com>
	<20120422190512.0273df93@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39667)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mandar.mitra@gmail.com>) id 1SM1oH-000544-FJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:46:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mandar.mitra@gmail.com>) id 1SM1oG-0003v6-0E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:46:57 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:35075)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mandar.mitra@gmail.com>) id 1SM1oF-0003ut-Nt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:46:55 -0400
Received: by dadz8 with SMTP id z8so19605192dad.38
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120422190512.0273df93@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Detlef Steuer wrote (Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 07:05:12PM +0200):
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:28:08 +0530
> Mandar Mitra <mandar.mitra@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Currently (version 7.8.09), if I have something like
> > 
> >     SCHEDULED: <2012-04-21 Sat>--<2012-04-24 Tue>
> 
> I use it without the SCHEDULED keyword and it does exactly what I need.

This *almost* does what I need, but I don't want the item to disappear
from the agenda simply because the scheduled period has passed. It
should go away only when I explicitly mark the item done.

Is this the behaviour you get?

Thanks,
Mandar.