From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Detlef Steuer Subject: Re: Sort order of TODO entries Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 19:14:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20120308191406.4ee1ccb7@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> References: <20120308155637.42844cf7@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> <871up3hyze.fsf@norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5hrF-00048w-O6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:14:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5hr5-00083I-Gs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:14:33 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5hr5-00082w-A0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:14:23 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5hr2-0007d9-9V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:14:20 +0100 Received: from vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de ([139.11.181.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:14:20 +0100 Received: from detlef.steuer by vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:14:20 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:52:05 -0500 Bernt Hansen wrote: > Detlef Steuer writes: > > > Dear ORGers. > > > > recently I started to priorize my TODO items. > > (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to > > discuss that ... ) > > > > I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: > > > > TODO [#A] > > TODO [#B] > > TODO/WAITING > > TODO [#C] > > > > I don't understand the reasoning in putting TODOs without priority or > > WAITING without priority before priority #C. > > > > Conceptually "no priority" (for me) means "not decided how important or > > not important at all, but would like to work on it", In contrast "#C" > > means "must be done, but do #A and #B first". > > They don't have 'no priority' -- they have the default priority which is > probably [#C]. You can set the default using variables. > > See: > org-default-priority > The default priority of TODO items. > org-highest-priority > The highest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. > org-lowest-priority > The lowest priority of TODO items. A character like ?A, ?B etc. > > You're free to change the default to Z or something as long as you also > set org-lowest-priority appropriately. Thank you both! Sorry for not getting it from the fine manual. 56 min from asking a question to two perfect answers! Just great! Detlef > > Regards, > Bernt > > > > > > It would IMHO feel much more natural to sort > > > > #A, #B, #C, no priority. > > > > Is that (easily) possible? > > > > SETUP: > > Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.553.g62a63) > > emacs GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) of 2011-02-22 on build34 > > > > Thx > > Detlef > >