From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Detlef Steuer Subject: Sort order of TODO entries Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20120308155637.42844cf7@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5em5-0007VR-Fs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:57:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5em0-00014n-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:57:01 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5em0-00014g-KG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:56:56 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5ely-0008QH-Gr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:56:54 +0100 Received: from vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de ([139.11.181.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:56:54 +0100 Received: from detlef.steuer by vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:56:54 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear ORGers. recently I started to priorize my TODO items. (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to discuss that ... ) I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: TODO [#A] TODO [#B] TODO/WAITING TODO [#C] I don't understand the reasoning in putting TODOs without priority or WAITING without priority before priority #C. Conceptually "no priority" (for me) means "not decided how important or not important at all, but would like to work on it", In contrast "#C" means "must be done, but do #A and #B first". It would IMHO feel much more natural to sort #A, #B, #C, no priority. Is that (easily) possible? SETUP: Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.553.g62a63) emacs GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) of 2011-02-22 on build34 Thx Detlef