From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: Default prewarning time for each deadline Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:54:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2012-04-05T16-52-27@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2012-04-05T10-39-20@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFo5J-0002cy-Ur for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:54:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFo57-0001dl-Js for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:54:47 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFo57-0001VM-DU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:54:37 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFo50-0005yt-KJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:54:30 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:54:30 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:54:30 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi! * Michael Brand wrote: > > But another solution is to set org-deadline-warning-days to 0 and > then set the deadline-individual explicit warning period only when > not 0. I tried that but unfortunately with this setting, an entry like «DEADLINE: <2012-04-23 Mon -20d>» does not appear on todays agenda at all :-( Is this due to another setting on my side (only)? -- Karl Voit