From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "sindikat" Subject: M-RET and C-RET Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:49:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20111125164909.85553.qmail@rage.so36.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyxg-0003mL-TN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:49:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyxd-0006a5-JJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:49:15 -0500 Received: from rage.so36.net ([83.223.73.105]:51466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyxd-0006YD-85 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:49:13 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello everyone, M-RET works with both headings and plainlists, it's DWIM. C-RET works only with headings. I wanted to ask, why C-RET is not DWIM? Wouldn't users want to add new list item respecting the content? Thanks in advance.