From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:42:17 +0200
Message-ID: <201110231442.17386.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33136)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RHxLU-0006Gw-Jz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:40:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RHxLT-0007zh-Kd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:40:08 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:36399)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RHxLT-0007xx-2e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:40:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"

what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?

That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the additional 
line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the 
"src"-part?

Daniel