From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: [yasnippet] Symbol's function definition is void: yas/next-field-group Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:27:57 +0200 Message-ID: <2011-08-10T16-26-55@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2011-08-09T13-25-48@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr9la-0003UN-Tz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:28:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr9lU-000531-9n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:28:18 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:34975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr9lU-00052q-0H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:28:12 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr9lT-00056A-0S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:28:11 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:28:11 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:28:11 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Bianca Lutz wrote: > Hi Karl, Hi! > The org info seems to be outdated: yas/next-field-group is called > yas/next-field nowadays. A simple rename should solve the issue. Oh, thanks! > BTW: Are you sure you need both calls to add-hook? The way I > understand the org manual is that you need either of them (not both at > the same time). You're absolutely right. I should have compared the things more intense. Now it works! -- Karl Voit