From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Memacs - effort and language (was: Represent *everything* in Org-mode) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:23:44 +0200 Message-ID: <2011-07-18T13-20-31@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2011-07-18T01-13-54@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87r55oca8e.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qilvf-0005Vw-64 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:24:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qilvb-0004hQ-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:24:03 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qilva-0004hK-K6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:23:58 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QilvZ-0000RC-HU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:23:57 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:23:57 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:23:57 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Rasmus wrote: > Hi, Hi! > It sounds very interesting. I would use something like that if it did > not require to much hassle after initial setup. My goal is that after the initial setup of one «connector» (I am sill searching for a cool name for this) the additional effort is nothing (or almost nothing) as long as nothing changes (APIs, cron jobs, ...). > Python is a nice language, and I too feel more comfortable writing it > than Emacs Lisp. The latter is more eloquent though. I am much more confident with Python since I did not learn (E)LISP yet. > Lets us know how it goes. Of course since I am interested in lots of people using (and improving) Memacs and its «connectors» :-) -- Karl Voit