From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Karl Maihofer <ignoramus@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Lists handling
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:55:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20101128125506.48916v63q2s6ewow@webmail.df.eu>
References: <20101126191600.17972vn4jdlkdm68@webmail.df.eu>
	<28320_1290815524_oAQNq442028994_87wrnzhcde.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
	<20101127124721.89832xmy1mxuwzwg@webmail.df.eu>
	<5367_1290881529_oARIC8fA005869_87vd3ihc0d.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=ISO-8859-1;
 DelSp="Yes";
 format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57903 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMfqY-0001ng-MV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:55:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ignoramus@gmx.de>) id 1PMfqX-0003D0-Qr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:55:10 -0500
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.40]:56812)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ignoramus@gmx.de>) id 1PMfqX-0003Cc-M6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:55:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5367_1290881529_oARIC8fA005869_87vd3ihc0d.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> schrieb:
>> With a drawer, you mean something like the following?
>> ,----
>> | - Item 1
>> |   - Item 1a
>> |     :COMMENT:
>> |     This is a comment.
>> |     :END:
>> |   - Item 1b
>> | - Item 2
>> | - Item 3
>> `----
>
> Yes.

It would be great to have drawers in lists. This is certaily a much  
cleaner structure than using inline tasks. But of course it lacks the  
possibility to define tasks withhin lists and to find them using the  
agenda. So I think both concepts may be useful - drawers for simple  
text and inline tasks to define tasks. ;-)

Until we have an opinion about inline tasks are there any arguments  
agains drawers for list items?

Regards,
Karl