From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Juan Pechiar <juan@pechiar.com>
Subject: Re: Change DOCTYPE declaration?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:02:12 -0200
Message-ID: <20101117230211.GI2450@soloJazz.com>
References: <20101117130409.773797d2amscopub-mail@yahoo.com@dove.localdomain>
	<20101117183427.GG2450@soloJazz.com>
	<20101117152308.63473cd6amscopub-mail@yahoo.com@dove.localdomain>
	<20101117214505.GH2450@soloJazz.com>
	<27942.1290032705@gamaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44339 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIr18-0003u7-2c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:02:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <juan@pechiar.com>) id 1PIr16-00053O-PD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:02:17 -0500
Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:51872)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <juan@pechiar.com>) id 1PIr16-00052r-Hn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:02:16 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <27942.1290032705@gamaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:25:05PM -0500, Nick Dokos wrote:
> #+BIND: uriel-change-doctype t
>
> but a good (if not scalable) solution to the problem.
>
> I have a question however: why is it that hooks can't be set using
> this mechanism?

>From my limited understanding, the #+BIND directive is for binding
variables.

For correctly adding a hook you must call add-hook, which adds a
function to the corresponding hook list.