From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan L Tyree Subject: Re: Export bug? Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:27:42 +1100 Message-ID: <20101020102742.ef32ee01.alantyree@gmail.com> References: <20101020101007.d45fc00d.alantyree@gmail.com> <22514.1287530195@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55282 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8Lax-00085c-Ue for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:27:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Lav-00067b-AI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:27:51 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:59380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Lav-00067R-7o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:27:49 -0400 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so2122055gxk.0 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:27:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22514.1287530195@alphaville.usa.hp.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:16:35 -0400 Nick Dokos wrote: > Alan L Tyree wrote: > > > I can't find anything about this in the manual. Is it a bug? > > > > These lines: > > > > "Victoria v Permewan Wright & Co Ltd/ (1914) 19 CLR 457 said (at > > 467) that the words were a "danger signal" to anyone who dealt with > > the cheque." > > > > export as though the "467)" was the beginning of an enumerated > > list. It happens in both XHTML and LaTeX export as in the following > > fragment: > > > > " Co Ltd} (1914) 19 CLR 457 said (at > > \begin{enumerate} > > \item that the words were a ``danger signal'' to anyone who dealt > > with \end{enumerate}" > > > > Maybe, but it's easy to work around: fix tha bad line break :-) Well, yes, but in my writing I have lots of these. I'm sure that I can devise a small function to fix it up, but it seems a trap for young players. > > "Victoria v Permewan Wright & Co Ltd/ (1914) 19 CLR 457 said (at 467) > that the words were a "danger signal" to anyone who dealt with > the cheque." > > Nick -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206