From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomas@tuxteam.de Subject: Re: Orgmode[PATCH] org-export-generic, "text markup" -- and a request Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20100802172958.GA31882@tomas> References: <20100723111931.GA29930@tomas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50631 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfylP-0006SK-1S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:25:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfylN-0001Ck-NY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:25:22 -0400 Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104]:50828 helo=www.elogos.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfylN-0001C8-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:25:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Wes Hardaker Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:54:44AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:19:31 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de said: >=20 > t> I tried contacting the author of org-export-generic, but don't know > t> whether I succeeded. Since this little patch might be useful, here i= t > t> is. >=20 > You succeeded... I'm just completely out of touch for the last two > weeks and it'll continue into next week minus this very very short brea= k > when I actually can read mail... Do take your time. No impatience here. > Anyway, I haven't read the email chain yet but if others think the patc= h > is fine then it may certainly be applied! I do hate myself how I did some things (the naming could take some discussion. For example: "text markup" is a bad name. I don't know how to subsume "strong", "emphasized"...). Besides, I'm unsure about this hook-adding business within the unwind-protect. Maybe others could chime in? Thanks, regards - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMVwCWBcgs9XrR2kYRAjTDAJ9X1jRrMJXKSnDkEjvotpPe/uiMPwCfRd66 /gJuF5E2ZI96o0cvLGqPpUU=3D =3DoO1k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----