From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Zacchiroli Subject: Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:00:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20100623080028.GB26395@upsilon.cc> References: <20100620094925.GA20877@upsilon.cc> <08902A9B-0C7F-41FB-AC8F-BFC65F296B5E@gmail.com> <20100622072316.GA14230@upsilon.cc> <4C208DAD.2060109@manor-farm.org> <64F0D23D-3D32-482C-8F95-ACF82F0FEFCF@gmail.com> <20100622104109.GA17922@upsilon.cc> <4756.1277217311@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20100622164051.GA25088@upsilon.cc> <8822.1277231428@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41389 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORKsr-0008KM-Sp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:00:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORKsp-0002Mt-Ro for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:00:33 -0400 Received: from upsilon.hackadomia.org ([91.121.245.170]:46881 helo=upsilon.upsilon.cc) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORKsp-0002MD-NY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:00:31 -0400 Received: from usha.takhisis.invalid (unknown [134.157.168.250]) by upsilon.upsilon.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C433C106A2 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:00:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8822.1277231428@alphaville.usa.hp.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org [ quoted text re-ordered ] On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > Just in case it's not clear already :-) I personally don't think it's > worth it (but I am a marginal voice at best.) What might be worth it is Yes, that is pretty clear :), but thanks for reinstating. Since, I find a couple of non-sequitur in your reasoning belows; I follow-up just for the sake of the argument. > ... and others can see this thread in the mailing list and follow suit. > Or they can use the info doc (section 1.1, "Summary") to find the org > website and follow the link to Worg. Or they can ask on the list. And No, they can't, *while they are offline*. > once they know how to get there, there will be no need for another > documentation blob to land on *everybody's* disk. Besides, if they can'= t That is not really a sound counter argument: most GNU-Emacs distributions are package based and can easily split out -doc packages to avoid wasting space on *everybody's* disk. > find it in one of those ways, what makes you think that they will be ab= le > to find it even if it is on their disk? Well, the Emacs help system is *very* powerful: once you entered a specific info topic, you can C-s and it will look for text in all the documentation; I would have personally found the information without bothering the list, had it been there. Cheers. --=20 Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'=E8 ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoi= e sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu =E0 tous ceux que j'aim= e