From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Wagner Subject: Re: Re: Update ispell-dictionary to text language Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:22:57 +0900 Message-ID: <201001151922.57686.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> References: <87d41gkhjb.fsf@mundaneum.com> <0D07D866-37AB-419D-BB59-61DC376681FB@gmail.com> <876373wxuq.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVjFG-0006JR-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:17:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVjFA-0006Eo-9T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:17:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46255 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVjF9-0006ES-Ty for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:17:27 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.211.177]:43762) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVjF9-0006pU-Kw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:17:27 -0500 Received: by ywh7 with SMTP id 7so390810ywh.24 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:17:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <876373wxuq.fsf@mundaneum.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Seb, Hi Carsten, I guess it depends highly on the definition. I can see Sebastien's points. It is somewhat strange to have a header-row "language" which does not have anything to do with the way how org-mode (resp. emacs) handels the org-buffer. And the danger to use two different places + the confusion of two slightly different styles may confuse esp. newbies like me. However, on the other side, it is said that C-c C-e t "insert the *export* option template". Which strongly refer to export features. I guess it would be more clear if there is a #+EXPORT_LANGUAGE tag. But to change this now is stupid as well. So not right sure what to do. Maybe leave it to people and offer a flag to say in the org config something like export_language is equal to ispell_language (maybe working both directions) Just two newbie-cents Totti