From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Norbert Zeh Subject: Re: Bug with time summary in column view? Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:34:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20091124233454.GB7194@cs.dal.ca> References: <20091124205627.GA7194@cs.dal.ca> <20091124215131.GA2013@yog-sothoth.mohorovi.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND4uS-0007p5-QS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:35:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND4uN-0007nY-QF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:35:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60144 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ND4uN-0007nN-JK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:34:55 -0500 Received: from hammer.cs.dal.ca ([129.173.22.32]:55093) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ND4uN-0005QF-J1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:34:55 -0500 Received: from monad.zehub.ca (NZeh.CS.Dal.Ca [129.173.213.24]) by hammer.cs.dal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E960B503AF for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:34:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from nzeh by monad.zehub.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ND4uM-00021F-BR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:34:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091124215131.GA2013@yog-sothoth.mohorovi.cc> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi James, thanks for the reply. [...] > Each column definition should start with a '%'. Try > > #+COLUMNS: %TODO %Effort(Estimate){:} Actually, this was just a mistake in copying this into the email. It does have the % in my colum specs. The way I noticed the issue what that my Debian box had 6.32b, while I had installed 6.33c, then f on my windows machine. Going back to 6.32b fixed the problem on the windows machine. Since it works for you, next question: which emacs version are you using? I'm running 23 on my windows box. Could this make a difference? Cheers, Norbert