From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Wagner Subject: Re: [babel] (solved) noweb does not work (as expected) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:02:21 +0900 Message-ID: <200911101202.21164.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> References: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7h04-0007j5-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:32 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7gzz-0007dr-Pf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:31 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7gzz-0007de-HP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:56211) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7gzz-0008Au-0j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:27 -0500 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so5222029ewy.42 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:02:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode Mailing List Hi, finally I found the problem. As Dan mentioned there is a difference for <> <> <> For some reason I was sticking with block1() and override it over and over again. No it seems to work go into the right direction. Python still seems not to like the code if its created by :noweb. However :tangle code seems to run fine. I will try to sort this out now. By the way, :noweb and :tangle seems to work nicely together which gives the freedom to go one or the other way to execute the source code blocks During fiddling around the last day, I found some quirks and "nice to have" requests. Should I simply post them on the list ? Thanks again for helping me Torsten