From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Wagner Subject: Re: [babel] noweb does not work (as expected) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:51:39 +0900 Message-ID: <200911101051.39479.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> References: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> <200911091616.56653.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> <87hbt3n0q7.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ftZ-0001Lc-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:51:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ftU-0001Fk-Vn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:51:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38140 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ftU-0001Fb-Qq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:51:40 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:62448) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7ftU-0005Xv-Dc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:51:40 -0500 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so5123151ewy.42 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:51:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hbt3n0q7.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dan Davison , Org Mode Mailing List Hi Dan > Important: The only version of org-babel that's intended for users is > the version in current org-mode. I.e. the current master branch of > Carsten's org-mode repository. The other repository (the babel repo) is > for development only. Any stable improvements in there are rapidly > merged into Carsten's repo. O.k. thanks for the clarification. I started using babel-git since in an older thread someone refereed that the functionality is no in a branch of babel-git. I did not know that you merge quickly with Carstens org-mode git. Depending on the speed of merging, you might like to use tags in babel-git signaling at which commit you merged org-babel back to org-mode. Then people can quickly run a git diff to see if the particular change they are looking for is already in merged to org-mode or not. > I think the main point is that the current set up means that org-mode > and org-babel share a common history of commits. My current idea of git > submodules is that I would include something as a submodule when it is a > module that gets used by multiple different projects... As far as I understand git submodules (but I never get in real use to them yet) they can be considered as a part of a project which keeps it own history. If that is right it might be perfect for org-mode and org-babel. You can develop on top of the org-mode git and does not cluttering the history of org- mode git. However, as far as I read there are some potential flaws which, if used wrong, can create some serious problems. Many thanks for helping me so fare Torsten