From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: making org-time-stamp a bit more interactive Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:30:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20091102143015.GC32187@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4xvM-0007ZZ-Jk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:30:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4xvI-0007WT-0y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:30:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60581 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N4xvH-0007WN-QG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:30:19 -0500 Received: from arctic.adamspiers.org ([212.13.194.176]:49793) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4xvH-0003qm-F0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:30:19 -0500 Received: from localhost (dsl-217-155-199-114.zen.co.uk [217.155.199.114]) by arctic.adamspiers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EFC2401B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list If I have an existing time stamp (e.g. SCHEDULED/DEADLINE) corresponding to (say) several months ago, and I want to update it to some date in the future, but I want to see the calendar in order to help decide the new date, I find the org-time-stamp interface slightly lacking. Ideally I could: - hit C-c . to start editing the time stamp - hit '.' to change it to the current day - use all the standard time stamp navigation bindings to move from today to a new date Unfortunately the 2nd step does not update the Calendar buffer, so the 3rd step navigates relative to the original date, not relative to today. Would it be easy to fix this? Ideally the fix would also apply if the 2nd step involved typing something like '+2w'. Thanks, Adam