From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs Subject: Re: Feature request about habit tracking [was: RELEASE: Org-mode version 6.32] Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20091102110618.GA16103@taupan.ath.cx> References: <20091030151334.GA6876@taupan.ath.cx> <5F5DB3D2-1637-4E14-9F80-B3199EDDF526@gmail.com> Reply-To: friedel@nomaden.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4ujy-0003X1-7m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:06:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4ujt-0003Uu-L5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:06:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58539 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N4ujt-0003Ur-CH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:06:21 -0500 Received: from dudelab.org ([212.12.33.202]:24213 helo=mail.dudelab.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4ujs-0008Ct-Ta for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:06:21 -0500 Received: from abrasax.taupan.ath.cx (p5DE8AB56.dip.t-dialin.net [93.232.171.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs", Issuer "User CA" (verified OK)) by mail.dudelab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B940E228148 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:06:40 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5F5DB3D2-1637-4E14-9F80-B3199EDDF526@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Hi! Carsten Dominik schrieb: > John and I are not really clear about exactly what you are > asking for. Can you try again? What exactly is the difference > between what we have now and what you are asking for? You know after I had sent that mail, I had the nagging thought that maybe I should have explicitely mentioned the difference: > >I'd really like habit tracking to be enabled for all TODOs with active > >timestamps + repeaters with the property :STYLE: habit. That means: Exactly what you have now, but add an option to also match active timestamps *without* the SCHEDULED or DEADLINE keyword. (i.e. similar to what you did for me in the icalendar export) And I hope the next paragraph also makes more sense now: > >Those things are rarely part of the hard landscape of the day for me, > >things won't blow up if I won't do them on exactly that same day, so I > >don't want them scheduled and don't want them on my calendar, but I > >want to be reminded in my agenda. But tracking how consistently I've > >done things on those days is still very useful. -- Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs TauPan on Ircnet and Freenode ;)