From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher DeMarco Subject: Re: How to measure a project's %complete? Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20090818140933.GA19781@owl.prv.maya.com> References: <20090818020317.GA7061@owl.prv.maya.com> <8763clckjx.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <871vn9ck5e.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdPNb-0000Qo-7B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdPNW-0000KX-Mr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55187 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdPNW-0000KQ-DL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:34 -0400 Received: from barracuda.maya.com ([192.70.254.44]:59189) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdPNW-0007Wh-0r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:34 -0400 Received: from stork.maya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barracuda.maya.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9190558B8E for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stork.maya.com (stork.maya.com [192.70.254.17]) by barracuda.maya.com with ESMTP id u2xVVx1FGmC0L8Qk for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:09:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from owl (owl.prv.maya.com [10.20.30.40]) by stork.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F75DD for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:12:39 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871vn9ck5e.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue Aug 18 09:43:25 2009 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Bernt Hansen writes: > Or maybe I jumped the gun a bit here. It works for the first level of > hierarchy similar to the way lists work. The level 1 task only counts > level 2 items. You can have separate cookies on the level 2 tasks which > count the level 3 subtasks etc. > > There is no way to count all of the items in the subtree AFAIK. Yeah, I was fiddling with that as well. And as far as I can tell, org-hierarchical-checkbox-statistics doesn't work for this case the way that it does for checklists. I think I can workaround this by making my planning clearer and not hiding assumptions in structural complexity :-) -- Christopher DeMarco IT Director MAYA Group +1-412-708-9660