From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:55 +0100
Message-ID: <200903200359.56081.jotapin2005@yahoo.fr>
References: <200903192112.34725.jotapin2005@yahoo.fr>
	<m2r60trzrx.fsf@pmade.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LkUyI-0006Eg-97
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:00:34 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LkUyC-0006E5-Sj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:00:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LkUyC-0006E2-MR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:00:28 -0400
Received: from mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.179]:39439)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr>) id 1LkUyC-0002yn-89
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:00:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2r60trzrx.fsf@pmade.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Peter Jones <pjones@pmade.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a =E9crit :
> Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
> > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribu=
te
> > to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
>
> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself.  When
> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
> time because of archive items.
>
> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet.  Maybe I'll try to fix
> this tomorrow when I get some time.

Thanks, this would be great.

Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:

I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do want to=
=20
keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes archives tags=
=20
to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must no cou=
nt=20
twice there...

Same question for clock tables.