From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: FR: headline iteration API Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:06:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20080611110623.GC19396@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20080530124619.GB9520@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF8D@kwik.ic.uva.nl> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6O9q-00044O-Vm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:06:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6O9p-00043x-KH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:06:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42992 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6O9p-00043u-EU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:06:25 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]:54420) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6O9o-0003Ca-S7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:06:25 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m5BB6NLI007293 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:06:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m5BB6Nje007287 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:06:23 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF8D@kwik.ic.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:57:39AM +0200, Dominik, C. wrote: > Hi Adam and others, > > I do like the idea of an API to iterate of entries and outline trees. > For now, I am following this discussion to see what ideas pop up. > When I find the time, something will be implemented. Great. As you can see from my other post, another use case just popped up. Am I right in thinking that you must already have a lot of the code for this? Presumably agenda generation and export must both do headline iteration in a similar manner? Full-blown reporting would be seriously cool. Think: pretty coloured graphs showing how the contents of your TODO lists vary over the days, weeks, months ... :-) Very useful for trending, planning, ensuring that the various areas of your life are kept in balance according to your "30,000-50,000 foot views", as David Allen calls them.