From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: FR: populate default prompt text for org-time-stamp on an existing time stamp? Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:19:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20071124211912.GC30662@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20071108130345.GW13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <50D70D98-9150-4C28-8780-C3B95192D068@science.uva.nl> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iw2PE-0001be-Nq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:19:16 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iw2PC-0001Zv-Uw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:19:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iw2PC-0001Zg-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:19:14 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iw2PB-0003ee-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:19:14 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lAOLJCqV025714 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:19:12 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lAOLJCv2025708 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:19:12 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50D70D98-9150-4C28-8780-C3B95192D068@science.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:49:11PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 8Nov2007, at 2:03 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >Another feature request (sorry - I'm beginning to feel quite guilty > >about the deluge I've rained on Carsten's inbox recently :-) > > As long as these requests are useful as this one, and as long as you > see it as the proposers task and duty to thoroughly test the new > feature once it is implemented, keep firing! Challenge accepted! :-) > I am putting this into 5.14 as well. Beautiful, thanks.