From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim O'Callaghan Subject: Re: Attention XEmacs users Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:02:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20060615190251.GA1860@Zangband> References: <20060615132109.GA1296@ELSAMSW37164> <63a66a48d7c1103233f61688e86f10b8@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fqx7c-00040p-Kc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:03:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fqx7Z-0003wf-UO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:03:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fqx7Z-0003wO-RO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:03:13 -0400 Received: from [193.120.211.34] (helo=dspsrv.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FqxH1-0006Sf-Tt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:13:00 -0400 Received: from [213.46.16.78] (helo=localhost) by dspsrv.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Fqx7Y-0005N9-00 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:03:12 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63a66a48d7c1103233f61688e86f10b8@science.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:38:03PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jun 15, 2006, at 15:21, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: > > > >Could you just add it into a 'contrib' type directory in the > >distribution file? > > Yes, I will distribute the file with Org-mode, but in an XEmacs > directory, not in contrib. If I put it in contrib, too many people > will install it also under Emacs, which will break it and create too > many emails for me :-) > > Yes, we could have a contrib directory. Any suggestions on how this > should be structured? It would need to have a mechanism to carry > documentation, and to clearly mark things as not under my > maintenance. > A simple Readme-.txt possibly? if you published a CVS/whatever tree as a 'src' distribution alongside the normal distro, it would then be up to the contrib maintainers to send you patches against it for distribution. This should work if you use the same type of pre-release warning email you sent for each release. Tim.