From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xavier Maillard Subject: Re: Autocollapse of outline nodes Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:08:39 +0200 Message-ID: <200604241808.39506.zedek@lolica.org> References: <3c12eb8d0604240515l3313b552o2ba25db2e7012f97@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY3bW-0005Kq-1Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY3bT-0005It-U2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:08:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FY3bT-0005Ip-Pr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:07:59 -0400 Received: from [212.27.33.233] (helo=smtp.apinc.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FY3dj-0003xd-G0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:10:19 -0400 Received: from [213.41.184.169] (helo=[10.0.0.2]) by smtp.apinc.org with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1FY3Tz-000782-00 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:00:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3c12eb8d0604240515l3313b552o2ba25db2e7012f97@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Monday 24 April 2006 14:15, Piotr Zielinski wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a small piece of code that periodically collapses all org nodes > (trees) which are far away (structurally) from the current cursor > position. The purpose is to automatically collapse nodes which you > are no longer working on, thereby preventing uncontrolled growth of > the visible size of your .org buffer as the day progresses. > > Please send your comments/suggestions, for example, whether this > functionality has already been implemented elsewhere. Should work > with any outline buffer. That's great !! Thank you. Xavier