From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-export-pdf-remove-logfiles extensions Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:36:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1E901979-E5AE-4473-AB4E-E1B6E418301C@gmail.com> References: <878wduiwzu.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <87fx82ecjk.fsf_-_@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDXxc-0006yJ-Po for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDXxX-0006wk-PM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53383 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NDXxX-0006wX-Gb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:07 -0500 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.146]:62652) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NDXxX-0004xf-8O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:07 -0500 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so123116eyh.34 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:36:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fx82ecjk.fsf_-_@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Stelmach?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Lukasz, I have applied, you patch, thanks. But... On Nov 25, 2009, at 6:31 PM, =C5=81ukasz Stelmach wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:56 PM, =C5=81ukasz Stelmach wrote: >>> XeLaTeX[1,2] produces some more files than pdflatex. These are: >>> .nav, .snm, .vrb. All named the same as the base file. The list in >>> org-export-as-pdf should be extended or even made customisable. >> I have fixed this. > > That's great. How about this one? I'm just not sure 'sexp is the best > type. No, I have changed that > P.S. Is it ok to post patches here? Yes. But can I convince you to sign the papers with the FSF so that I =20= can also accept longer patches from you? - Carsten