From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Export as HTML Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:45:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1E2E8AB7-274B-4283-AC02-631D165C06E1@gmail.com> References: <87hc1bwfsq.fsf@mundaneum.com> <874oxbwedd.fsf@mundaneum.com> <871vsfgpom.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <873acvhxwe.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoLYR-0001bP-TP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:45:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoLYN-0001Wl-2I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:45:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55950 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoLYM-0001WV-Qe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:45:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:62831) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoLYM-0000hA-AJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:45:42 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2289630ewy.42 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:45:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <873acvhxwe.fsf@fastmail.fm> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matthew Lundin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Vauban?= On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or >> whatever other name we can find a consensus for. >> >> I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the >> benefit of doing that. >> >> On the other hand, I cannot really see ths issue here, because the >> name in the templates could be changed as well, and I would suspect >> that this is a common issue name clashes when using templates. > > Completely agreed. This is not an important problem. Anyone who > chooses > to use org-mode for publishing a web site should know a little bit > about > hacking css. And as Sebastian R. suggests, we should certainly *not* > change org-export because of some random css template! Yes. Still, if it is "common practice" to call this outermost container "container" instead of "content", I would not object to rename it. - Carsten > > Let me clarify that I am perfectly happy with the current behavior. > And > I have a vested interest in *not* having it changed, since I'm lazy > and > don't want to have to change my css file again. :) > > - Matt