From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.frings@agfa.com Subject: Re: missing todo's in agenda after emacs/org upgrade Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:39:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1BFB86EA-19DB-4B0E-9AAF-936CEB691A7B@agfa.com> References: <06FD744B-8465-49C4-9A4A-45E2B4DCBF2B@agfa.com> <80y5yqpgin.fsf@somewhere.org> <3247E27F-C23D-4B93-9040-C64C8B7546F1@agfa.com> <3CFA5C89-CCDA-4D08-8974-2B3609BD7151@gmail.com> <7B2BD421-0D6F-4DE5-9156-4C4C385FD622@agfa.com> <4E8186B4-9DCF-4750-A083-870B2B23F784@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuNPx-0004Cp-DW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:39:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuNPw-0002BW-Gx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:39:17 -0400 Received: from mornm02-out.agfa.com ([134.54.1.77]:49721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuNPw-0002BQ-BP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:39:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E8186B4-9DCF-4750-A083-870B2B23F784@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 19 Aug 2011, at 13:05, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Aug 19, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Peter Frings wrote: >> On 19 Aug 2011, at 11:59, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>=20 >>> The two main issues you are having are these: >>>=20 >>> 1. There is no simple way for beginners to get both TODO and agenda = in one view >>> 2. Moving through time does not work in a block view when the cursor = is in the TODO list. >> Fixing 2 would be great. Maybe there are other keystrokes that can be = delegated to other blocks (e.g. in order of appearance) if the = currently-focussed block doesn=92t handle them? > The reason why this would be confusing is that there might be > several blocks which accept a particular command, so it would > be unclear for the code how to select one, and even more > difficult for the user to have an intuitive feeling on what was > changed why=85. I can understand that this requires quite some changes and that it might = be a lot of work. However, I don=92t think it would be = counter-intuitive, unless there are many conflicting commands (i.e., a = same keystroke that has a different effect depending on the block type). = Are there that many? E.g., take the =91w=92 or =91d=92 keys in the = agenda view. Suppose I=92m on the TODO block and type a =91w=92. Would = it be that much surprising if the agenda block switches to a week view? = Probably not.=20 Of course, there might be sufficient cases that prove me wrong; after = all I=92m not really familiar with the different blocks. So I=92ll stop = nagging :-) I=92ll swap the order as you suggested and give it a try! Thanks! Peter.