From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug in the :VISIBILITY: handling of nested "folded" properties?
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:28:22 +0200
Message-ID: <1B523266-BAD0-47CB-BB78-6690B1CE9200@gmail.com>
References: <i2uboe$9m2$1@dough.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37665 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oi9jn-0006lr-PY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 13:32:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1OhdpS-0006J8-Rz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 03:28:27 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:47767)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1OhdpS-0006Iy-Kr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 03:28:26 -0400
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so3337941ewy.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <i2uboe$9m2$1@dough.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:

> Having
>
> * headline 1
> :PROPERTIES:
> :VISIBILITY: folded
> :END:
> ** headline 2.1
>  - stuff
> ** headline 2.1
> :PROPERTIES:
> :VISIBILITY: folded
> :END:
> - stuff
>
> C-u C-u <TAB>
>    Switch back to the startup visibility of the buffer, i.e. =20
> whatever is requested by startup options and =91VISIBILITY=92 =
properties =20
> in individual entries.
>
>
> does not result in
>
>
> * headline 1...>
>
>
> as expected. Instead I get:
>
>
> * headline 1...>
> ** headline 2.1...>
> ** headline 2.1...>
>
>
> removing the second folded propertiy results correctly in:
>
> * headline 1...>
>
>
> This looks like a bug in the :VISIBILITY: handling!?

No, I don't think so.  You are asking for trouble by using this
property in a nested way.  Nooruls patch seems to fix it though,
I have applied it.

- Carsten