From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott May <bscottmay@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Babel] Unexpected behavior evaluating function source blocks
 defined in a list
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <199607.61944.qm@web65610.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52297 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PV3Ce-0002sS-5p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:28:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bscottmay@yahoo.com>) id 1PV3Cb-00033R-To
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:28:36 -0500
Received: from nm6-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.52.70]:31675)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bscottmay@yahoo.com>) id 1PV3Cb-00032Q-OA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:28:33 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I noticed that when I evaluate a function whose definition is embedded in a 
list, the function does not evaluate if it is embedded in a list with no blank 
line preceding /and/ the function is indented. The function can be evaluated as 
expected with either a blank line preceding the definition or with no 
indentation of the source block. 

* Org snippet:

+ This works as I expect with a blank line preceding the source block:

  #+source: square(x)
  #+begin_src emacs-lisp
    (* x x)
  #+end_src

  #+call: square(x=3)

  #+results: square(x=3)
  : 9

+ Or if the source block is not indented:
#+source: cube(x)
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
  (* x x x)
#+end_src

#+call: cube(x=3)

#+results: cube(x=3)
: 27

+ But if I don't have a blank line, and the source block is indented,
  the bullet text gets incorporated into a table along with the
  source block:
  #+source: quartic(x)
  #+begin_src emacs-lisp
    (* x x x x)
  #+end_src

  #+call: quartic(x=3)

  #+results: quartic(x=3)
  | But if I don't have a blank line, and the source block is indented,\n  the 
bullet text gets incorporated into a table along with the\n  source block:\n 
 #+source: quartic(x)\n  #+begin_src emacs-lisp\n    (* x x x x)\n  #+end_src |