From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Org from ELPA question Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:17:28 -0500 Message-ID: <19292.1322122648@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUUy-0002sv-NF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:17:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUUs-0004iG-QK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:17:36 -0500 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:25726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTUUs-0004iA-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:17:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Stelian Iancu of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:03:50 +0100." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stelian Iancu Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Stelian Iancu wrote: > Hi all, > > Org and Emacs newbie here. > > Using GNU Emacs 24.0.91.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS > apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2011-11-20 on bob.porkrind.org and Org from > ELPA updated yesterday. > > I am encountering the problem with org-capture described here: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/48584 > > After upgrading org yesterday, I can see that org-compat.el defines > indeed the function org-pop-to-buffer-same-window. > > M-x locate-library tells me the following for org-compat: > > Library is file ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20111123/org-compat.elc > > So it seems that the correct one is seen. However, after require-ing > org-compat, the function from above is still not known. Any ideas why? > Probably because you did not compile the new .el files: it's picking up the old .elc file which still exists. Check the modification times of org-compat.el and org-compat.elc to make sure. Somebody else will have to tell you how to fix it though (whether the above is correct or not): I've never played with ELPA packages. Nick