From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Subject: Re: Docs submitted (Was Re: Advice sought on managing decision alternatives.) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1778.65.96.63.84.1234469596.squirrel@mail.panix.com> References: <20090101170227.C707734803@mail2.panix.com> <1044.66.30.185.29.1234039592.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <6444D654-9B7B-415D-A6DB-F3BADCB1EE2A@uva.nl> <1451.24.63.21.131.1234124707.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <8BD25355-1218-4DB5-9C85-77EA011540D0@uva.nl> <1555.24.62.30.15.1234235653.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <2162.24.62.30.15.1234306137.squirrel@mail.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXhw5-00073n-A2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXhvy-00072Q-1G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53753 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXhvx-00072J-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:17 -0500 Received: from mail2.panix.com ([166.84.1.73]:53078) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXhvx-0003hh-6J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Manish Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: >> [...] >> I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before? > > Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below: > > First the test file. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0) > LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+) > > * Which editor to use? > *** LEANING_TOWARDS Emacs > *** LEANING_TOWARDS Vim > *** LEANING_TOWARDS Textmate > *** REJECTED Gedit > *** REJECTED Textpad > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > 0. I have latest org-choose loaded, org-mode restarted, and local > setup refreshed. > 1. S-right on the second item to switch it to CHOSEN state. It works. > 2. Now S-right on the first item to switch it to CHOSEN state. Also > works. > > Both entries stay at CHOSEN state whereas I expected the second entry > to switch to a NON-CHOSEN state (possibly switching just one state > backwards not all the way back to REJECTED, but then I do not yet > understand it fully.) > > Is this the right behaviour? If yes, please help me understand this a > little. Or could I be doing or have something wrong in my setup? That's not right the behavior, but again I can't seem to reproduce this.=20 Using your test file and following your instructions, I get the correct behavior. Specifically, after S-right on second item: [begin] * Which editor to use? *** NOT_CHOSEN Emacs *** CHOSEN Vim *** NOT_CHOSEN Textmate *** REJECTED Gedit *** REJECTED Textpad [end] Then after S-right on the first item, again correctly: [begin] * Which editor to use? *** MAYBE Emacs *** LEANING_TOWARDS Vim *** NOT_CHOSEN Textmate *** REJECTED Gedit *** REJECTED Textpad [end] Now there's clearly something different between my setup and yours that i= t causing a bug, but it's very difficult to diagnose and fix at a distance. I have a theory that it's caused by an unloaded library whose absence mak= es `org-map-entries' abort. What I'm going to try is to add a require for org-agenda. Will you try i= t and tell me whether it fixes the bug? Because I just can't see the bug i= n my setup. Tom Breton (Tehom)