From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Formal description of Org files Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:43:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1564.1310841797@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4213EBED-2EFC-413F-8618-2A594AECEDCF@gmail.com> <877hav8lup.fsf@gmail.com> <2970.1302892280@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20110420123741.GA21304@buga.lan> <87aacew4el.fsf@gnu.org> <32582.1310836143@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi9pz-0000cn-FV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:43:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi9px-0000l8-KY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:43:39 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:64272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi9px-0000kl-3J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:43:37 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LOF00GPUW06J5LN@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:43:30 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from suvayu ali of "Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:21:17 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: suvayu ali Cc: Bastien , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode mailing list , Marcelo de Moraes Serpa , Carsten Dominik suvayu ali wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > > There was a discussion about this on the list a few months ago, but I > > can't get to search.gmane.org to find the thread atm, although I can get > > to news.gmane.org: is that me or is gmane's search on the fritz? > > > > I think you are replying to that same thread. > Right you are! I blitzed on the fact that Marcelo was replying in that thread: I thought it was a new one. Sorry about the noise, Nick