From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug: \log and friends are not recognized as math [6.34b] Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:54:38 -0500 Message-ID: <15558.1265122478@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4B52F4D9.9060406@gmail.com> <4B63408A.9060100@gmail.com> <4236.1265042403@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4425.1265043536@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <11146.1265067424@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <682EBC70-8B21-45F5-B937-D8ABD14E5B5C@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NcKAy-0003Zn-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:56:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39433 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcKAy-0003Zc-8t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:56:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcKAw-00047Y-HC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:56:23 -0500 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:65529) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcKAw-0003vq-6w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:56:22 -0500 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KX700CFNYR2YSN7@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:54:51 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:25:55 +0100." <682EBC70-8B21-45F5-B937-D8ABD14E5B5C@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Pank Roulund Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi Nick, > > am I right that you are now through with this, so that I can start my > work based on your last iteration? > Carsten, yes, I think it's done. Nick