From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ST Subject: Re: Footnotes in the manual (hidden option?) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1542105535.1883.9.camel@gmail.com> References: <1526495158.1951.4.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMW6B-00015Y-JC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:39:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMW68-0007qt-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:39:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]:38288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMW68-0007fg-5u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:39:08 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id e3-v6so12717789wrs.5 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 02:39:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Org-mode On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 14:31 -0400, Kaushal Modi wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:27 PM ST wrote: > > Hello, > > in the manual > > https://orgmode.org/manual/Footnotes.html#Footnotes > > it says that footnotes[fn:1] > > [fn:1] look like this > > > but actually[1] > > [1] works as well and looks even better. > > So why this option is not documented? > > > I would think that's so because canonically Org mode using [fn:1] > style. It looks like you are manually typing the footnote refs and > definitions. > > > Try using C-c C-x f binding.. you will see that Org inserts the > footnotes in the documented style. > > > I would say that the "fn"-style footnotes remove any kind of > ambiguity.. It's true that [1] alone may very well introduce ambiguity, but why not to take something more lightweight and language/alphabet independent, like [^1]? 1. It's three times shorter (its important if you type manually in GitLab/GitHub without the C-c C-x f binding); 2. If you type in another language - you don't have to switch the keyboard; 3. If your text is in another alphabet - latin "fn" disturbs the eye. 4. It feels a bit heavy as a markup for the lightweight org . (a) May I propose the [^1] as an alternative footnotes syntax as a new feature? (b) How can I define such syntax by my own as a footnote? Thank you!