From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ST Subject: Re: Link abbreviations: include abbreviation table and linkwords with spaces Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 11:20:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1521364824.17859.14.camel@gmail.com> References: <1520886927.1793.99.camel@gmail.com> <87r2ooanzd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1520931065.1930.4.camel@gmail.com> <871sgo8hbj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1520942003.1930.32.camel@gmail.com> <87sh92lpr5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1521185923.17859.1.camel@gmail.com> <87zi378z0t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exUUU-0003hV-41 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 05:20:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exUUO-0003wi-V1 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 05:20:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]:41280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exUUO-0003te-Fl for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 05:20:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f14so15579747wre.8 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 02:20:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zi378z0t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thank you! Unfortunately my (lack of) elisp knowledge doesn't allow me to implement this feature myself. I'll wait until somebody finds it useful enough... On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 22:57 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > ST writes: > > > to those engineers, who are responsible for adding new features: does this case > > of enabling linkwords with spaces (see below) qualifies as a new feature > > request? > > I have no objection, but it needs to be tested carefully. > > > If yes - where should I file it? > > It is already filed here, on the ML. However, I suggest to give it a go, > as it may be faster that waiting for someone to implement it. > > Regards, >