From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Is this a good feature to have? Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:52:49 +0100 Message-ID: <14D14DE1-6E0E-49AF-951F-D85B1617946F@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdP7S-0002wK-Hy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:52:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdP7O-0002st-R3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:52:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49099 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdP7O-0002sn-MU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:52:54 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218]:35673) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdP7O-0004DA-8Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:52:54 -0400 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so2869314bwz.31 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Aug 17, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Leo wrote: > Hi all, > > Remember is a convenient tool for collecting tasks. However I always > feel it can be more flexible in someway since I started using it > quite a > while ago. So I have the following proposal. > > 1. Add a key C-c i for each % in the *Remember* buffer. > For > example, `C-c i a' shall toggle the insertion of the annotation. > > 2. Add a new syntax to % as a placeholder for the corresponding > C-c i . For example, % can be used in a template to > indicate > the place to insert annotation when pressing `C-c i a'. if no > placeholder is indicated in the template, then `C-c i a' insert the > annotation in current place. > > This proposal is to eliminate the need to define multiple similar > templates. For example, one with annotation and another without, or > one > with clipboard and another without. Hmmm, maybe it would be better to just make something like "%a?" and make that prompt a y-or-no question to insert the annotation or not... ? - Carsten