From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: Making DocBook xml books from org mode? Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:46:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1475498771.1414103.744184105.445222A7@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1475172280.399769.741096521.05684B25@webmail.messagingengine.com> <878tuajysi.fsf@fastmail.fm> <1475187422.3176053.741333169.0906F627@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1475250249.663446.742041297.1ACDFDFD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87y426igda.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d1jidvzp.fsf@nwalsh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2dQ-0001fi-Fc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:46:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2dM-0008Sn-BR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:46:19 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br2dL-0008RI-5q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:46:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d1jidvzp.fsf@nwalsh.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sun, Oct 2, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Norman Walsh wrote: > Joost Kremers writes: > > There's also a `docbook' writer, > > which has been part of Pandoc much longer and which outputs to (I > > assume) DocBook v4. So I suspect you either need to upgrade your Pandoc > > or make sure ox-pandoc sets the output format to `docbook'. > > Depending on what your down-stream processing is like, you could > just go with V4 DocBook from org and then convert that to V5 with > the upgrade stylesheet. > Thank you, Norm. I'll keep that in mind, but if I can get directly to DocBook5, that seems easier and less "lossy." Cheers, -pd -- Peter Davis www.techcurmudgeon.com