From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Subject: Re: Advice sought on managing decision alternatives. Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:25:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1451.24.63.21.131.1234124707.squirrel@mail.panix.com> References: <20090101170227.C707734803@mail2.panix.com> <1131.66.30.178.137.1230850437.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <1371.66.30.178.137.1232336005.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <1057.24.63.22.246.1233375672.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <1036.24.63.0.170.1233950825.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <60BDFE6D-6B8C-4A23-A737-67DC1F523C79@uva.nl> <1044.66.30.185.29.1234039592.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <6444D654-9B7B-415D-A6DB-F3BADCB1EE2A@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGDG-0002Do-57 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:25:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGDE-0002DC-PO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:25:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55875 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGDE-0002D2-FI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:25:08 -0500 Received: from mail1.panix.com ([166.84.1.72]:57721) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWGDE-0002WQ-51 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:25:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6444D654-9B7B-415D-A6DB-F3BADCB1EE2A@uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Tom Breton > Hi Tom, > > I have now added org-choose.el, it is part of the current git status. > > A few comments: > [...] > Yes, this is correct. I appreciate you noticing this additional > point where changes have to be made. > However, for now I have opted for a different solution: I made the > sequence interpretation the last test in the cond chain, so that > all interpretations that are not `type' will fall back to this > mechanism. Great, that's better than my solution. > > I think what is missing now is documentation. It seems to me that > there should be some minimal documentation in org-choose.el, > and it would be great to get a tutorial on Worg which describes > this in more detail. What sort of format are you looking for? [From other email] > I also changed the call to add to the interpretation types > for the widget so that it appends its value to the list, > rather than adding to the front. Hope you agree, > I made this change right in contrib/lisp/org-choose.el Good. It occurred to me shortly after I sent the file that it would be better to append. Tom Breton (Tehom)