From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+] Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:55:04 -0400 Message-ID: <14151.1250477704@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <907065090908161814k63c0d518md09fc071e639b614@mail.gmail.com> <13103.1250473698@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <13768.1250476294@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1McsOi-0002Zk-B2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1McsOd-0002ZJ-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51997 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1McsOc-0002ZG-KC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:30 -0400 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:11587) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1McsOc-0007Qx-7K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:30 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([98.110.172.159]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KOI002HS2RFYXB0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:54:57 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Nick Dokos of "Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:31:34 EDT." <13768.1250476294@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, waterloo Nick Dokos wrote: > ... > The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ: > > http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike, > > is obtained using the ulem package: > > > \usepackage{ulem} > > ... > \sout{strike-through} > ... > > ...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention: \usepackage{soul} ... \st{strike-through} ... I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same problem. Nick