From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Invalid function: with-parsed-tramp-file-name with Perl Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:36:19 -0400 Message-ID: <14004.1348162579@alphaville> References: <87hau4ubgp.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <7708.1340286834@alphaville> <87a9zwvhtp.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8083.1340291591@alphaville> <87395jub00.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <877grro2av.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87haqupgfx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3vqfjkd.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87wqzql4e6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87boh2fgqu.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <6364.1348062546@alphaville> <878vc5n8uu.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <9580.1348084284@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87a9wkwzpa.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <10076.1348153868@alphaville> <11268.1348155026@alphaville> <13825.1348161712@alphaville> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53485) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEkfn-00058t-Jd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:36:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEkfm-0006j1-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:36:23 -0400 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:15118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEkfm-0006ir-EB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:36:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos of "Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:21:52 EDT." <13825.1348161712@alphaville> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Loris Bennett , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos wrote: > I haven't chased it all the way down because the reverts are > making my head spin, but it may be that somehow the above commit > got lost somewhere - or it got fixed and then the big revert lost > the fix. Maybe Eric or Bastien remembers what happened. > This doesn't make sense (I blame the head-spinning reverts :-) ), so let me try again: Eric's commit broke it between 7.8.03 and 7.8.04. It got fixed somehow, either because of a revert or because some fix was actually applied, I don't know which. It was working until 7.8.10 and then Bastien's commit reverted to (broken) 7.8.04, so from 7.8.11- on the breakage exists. So if there was a fix, we need to find it and reapply. If not, someone (presumably Eric) will need to take a look and possibly develop a fix. Nick